but some of the other bits are configured to provide power. I’ve been looking at the device tree files, but I’m a bit stuck as to what is missing - I don’t really know what the gpio parameters are, and the only thing I can think of doing is setting it to be always on by setting it’s voltage parameter to 3300000 in the dts like it is for vcc3v3_sys
Same issue here. Two Firefly RK3399’s, brand new, ordered and received about a month apart. Wondering about some physical board mis-configuration/installation or removal of 0-Ohm options/etc. Here is a dmesg | grep pci output:
[ 0.235599] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: parsed ‘gpio’ property of node ‘/vcc3v3
-pcie-regulator[0]’ - status (0)
[ 0.235647] vcc3v3_pcie: no parameters
[ 0.235804] reg-fixed-voltage vcc3v3-pcie-regulator: vcc3v3_pcie supplying 0u
V
[ 0.342952] phy phy-pcie-phy.5: Looking up phy-supply from device tree
[ 0.342962] phy phy-pcie-phy.5: Looking up phy-supply property in node /pcie-
phy failed
[ 0.344882] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: GPIO lookup for consumer ep
[ 0.344892] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: using device tree for GPIO lookup
[ 0.344919] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: parsed ‘ep-gpios’ property of node ‘/pc
ie@f8000000[0]’ - status (0)
[ 0.345159] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie3v3-supply from devi
ce tree
[ 0.345170] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie3v3-supply property
in node /pcie@f8000000 failed
[ 0.345184] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: no vpcie3v3 regulator found
[ 0.345746] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie1v8-supply from devi
ce tree
[ 0.345755] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie1v8-supply property
in node /pcie@f8000000 failed
[ 0.345766] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: no vpcie1v8 regulator found
[ 0.346338] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie0v9-supply from devi
ce tree
[ 0.346347] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie0v9-supply property
in node /pcie@f8000000 failed
[ 0.346358] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: no vpcie0v9 regulator found
[ 0.888882] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: PCIe link training gen1 timeout!
[ 0.889603] rockchip-pcie: probe of f8000000.pcie failed with error -110
[ 1.038857] ehci-pci: EHCI PCI platform driver
root@firefly:~# parameters
-bash: parameters: command not found
root@firefly:~# dmesg | grep pci | more
[ 0.235599] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: parsed ‘gpio’ property of node ‘/vcc3v3
-pcie-regulator[0]’ - status (0)
[ 0.235647] vcc3v3_pcie: no parameters
[ 0.235804] reg-fixed-voltage vcc3v3-pcie-regulator: vcc3v3_pcie supplying 0u
V
[ 0.342952] phy phy-pcie-phy.5: Looking up phy-supply from device tree
[ 0.342962] phy phy-pcie-phy.5: Looking up phy-supply property in node /pcie-
phy failed
[ 0.344882] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: GPIO lookup for consumer ep
[ 0.344892] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: using device tree for GPIO lookup
[ 0.344919] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: parsed ‘ep-gpios’ property of node ‘/pc
ie@f8000000[0]’ - status (0)
[ 0.345159] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie3v3-supply from devi
ce tree
[ 0.345170] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie3v3-supply property
in node /pcie@f8000000 failed
[ 0.345184] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: no vpcie3v3 regulator found
[ 0.345746] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie1v8-supply from devi
ce tree
[ 0.345755] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie1v8-supply property
in node /pcie@f8000000 failed
[ 0.345766] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: no vpcie1v8 regulator found
[ 0.346338] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie0v9-supply from devi
ce tree
[ 0.346347] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: Looking up vpcie0v9-supply property
in node /pcie@f8000000 failed
[ 0.346358] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: no vpcie0v9 regulator found
[ 0.888882] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: PCIe link training gen1 timeout!
[ 0.889603] rockchip-pcie: probe of f8000000.pcie failed with error -110
[ 1.038857] ehci-pci: EHCI PCI platform driver
did you manage to get the PCIe on the NGFF working?
I myself also have an RF3399 with the intent to use it as a storage server by using this PCIe 2.0 to 4x SATA adapter https://www.delock.com/produkte/G_62850/merkmale.html
Unfortunately it didn’t work right from the start (same messages as you see). So there is obviously stuff to do with the device tree but after measuring the PCIE_3V3 signal I found that the supply voltage from U15 is there.
The main issue seems so be differrent:
M.2 has 4 config pins
config_0 : Pin 21
config_1 : Pin 69
config_2 : Pin 75
config_3 : Pin 1
as described here http://pinoutguide.com/HD/M.2_NGFF_connector_pinout.shtml
If you look at the schematic you can get the impression that config_0 is not connected and the others are connected to GND (with the caveat that the Pin numbers in the schematic does not match the official pin numbers, e.g. config_0 is numbered 13 instead of 21).
This would mean the board will only be able to accept WWAN-SIC (if config_0 is left open) or SATA (if config_0 is tied to GND on the m.2 card). http://download-c.huawei.com/download/downloadCenter?downloadId=18428 http://www.computex.biz/PhotoPool2/201406/201406251407499629.pdf
Unfortunately for me my PCIe > SATA adapter pulls config_1 to PCIE_3V3 (which leads to high current consumption and is also not correct).
So I have some questions to the Firefly Team:
Can you provide a schematic with correct config pin numbers
Why did you connect all this config pins to GND instead of pull them up to PCIE_3V3 and route them to GPIO as proposed here https://mindchasers.com/dev/m2-connectors ?
Is config_1 (pin69) actually connected to GND (without a 0 Ohm bridge)
If so, can you provide a board layout with this line highlighted so I can (hopefully) scratch it off?
The article opened my eyes to so many new ideas. 300-835 valid study questions free offers great content that I hope helps you, and it’s entirely free.
I feel like I’ve gained a whole new perspective. The Latest test FCP_GCS_AD-7.6 lab questions exam questions are available for free! Good luck on your exams!
Without thinking, I’m liking this amazing content. 212-89 latest study guide sheet test questions—free and essential for your career and salary advancement!
What a captivating article, I truly appreciate your sharing it. The CLT test simulator test was vital in advancing my career and income—today, it’s yours for free!